THW blame Bank Indonesia for Citybabnk case

       Again and again 2nd RDE was conducted by EFEC, yesterday RDE held in front of secretariat UKM/HIMA centre at 03.30 p.m. the ltest RDE used different with the 1st RDE that using Asian parliamentary, but the 2nd used British Parliamentary, BP (British parliamentary) was consist pf 2 benches those are Government bench and opposition bench, but in this BP each bench divide into 2 part half those are opening half and closing half, so in BP consist of 4 team each team has 2 debaters, those the team Fian and Anes as Opening Government, Hafidz and Bonar as Opening Oppositon, Alan and Dian Annisa as Closing Government, Fandy and Algi as Closing Oppostion, and Nurma as Adjudicator.

       Yesterday EFEc had conducted RDE with the great attention from Economics Students. This was the resume of the latest RDE, OG (opening Government) offer the problem and open what is the real happen in Citybank and proved that BI proper to be blamed by the Indonesia Government, OO (Opening Opposition) negated what OG argument, and prove that BI not proper to be blamed by Indonesia Government and proved that the real problem was coming from Citybank, CG (Closing Government) negateed the case that already brought by OO and showed the case that Citybank was not failed for the case, CG (Closing Government) was negated what the case that had already brought by CG, and CO must be proved that the Citybank was the one that proper to be blamed by Indonesia Government not Bank Indonesia because Citybank did not obeyed to Bi regulation and Citybank had no tight regulation for preventing the fraud action by its worker.

       And For the result Nurma as Adjudicator decided Opening Opposition as the 1st position, Closing Oppositon as the 2nd position, Closing Opposition as the 3rd position, and Opening Opposition as the 4th position.

So lets waiting for the 3rd RDE next month.